Hello All, Yesterday we looked at the payload-range capabilities of the different A321neo variants. We now attempt to estimate the payload-range capabilities of the largest 737 MAX variant, the 737-10. In this blog’s opinion, the 737-10 will enter passenger...
Hello All,
Yesterday we looked at the payload-range capabilities of the different A321neo variants. We now attempt to estimate the payload-range capabilities of the largest 737 MAX variant, the 737-10. In this blog’s opinion, the 737-10 will enter passenger service no earlier than 2025.
A larger wing brings more range
When Boeing introduced the 737 NG, it redesigned the wing from the 737 Classic. The result was a wing with more fuel capacity than the A320 family: 20.9 metric tons vs. 19.1.
The larger wing allowed the 737-800 to operate US transcontinental flights without an auxiliary fuel tank. The 737-900 did not have enough range and required an auxiliary fuel tank for US coast-to-coast flights: the 737-900ER has the capacity for an extra 2.9 metric tons of fuel.
The 737-9, with more fuel-efficient engines, does not require auxiliary fuel tanks for US transcontinental operations. The variant has a nominal range of 3,300 nautical miles, 200 less than the smaller 737-8.
Assumptions for the 737-10
We build the estimated 737-10 payload-range diagram from the one of the 737-9:
Per Boeing’s website, the 737-9 carries 178 passengers in a standard configuration up to 3,300nm. Assuming a weight of 215 pounds per passenger, the payload at that range is 17.4 metric tons. We use the payload-range diagram of the 737-9 from the Airport Planning Manual to complete it. For the 737-10 we assume it carries 188 passengers up to 3,100nm. It translates into a payload of 18.3 metric tons. We then build an estimated payload-range diagram for the 737-10 assuming a slightly higher fuel burn.Below is the estimated payload range diagram of the 737-900ER, 737-9, 737-10, and A321neo with or without an ACT:
A US Transcon aircraft but not more
The 737-10 will likely have payload-range capabilities close to those of the 737-9. With a nominal range of 3,100nm, the larger wing fuel tank makes US transcontinental operations possible without an auxiliary fuel tank in standard configurations (180-190 passengers).
The aircraft can though carry less payload than the A321neo (an estimated two fewer metric tons). US legacy carriers can carry 200 passengers on the A321neo, vs. 188 envisioned for United’s 737-10 cabin. Note that the 737-10 does not have enough payload range for US transcontinental operations in a low-cost cabin of 230 passengers, while the A321(X)LR can do so.
Boeing had to modify the landing gear to allow adequate rotation for the 737-10 at takeoff. The field performance of the 737-10 will be behind that of the A321neo. It will therefore be tricky to increase the aircraft MTOW further to boost range, like Airbus did for the A321neo.
Conclusion
The 737-10 without auxiliary fuel tanks will be capable of US transcontinental operations, like the A321neo with one ACT. However, the 737 architecture is pushed to the limit and cannot accommodate further MTOW hikes to improve the payload-range capabilities. So the 737-10 won’t be able to fly across the Atlantic like the A321(X)LR.
There are also question marks around the 737-10 field performance and engine durability (it is a thrust boost of the LEAP-1B that is on the 737-8). This isn’t a problem at most large international airports with long runways but will be at some, such as Maui’s OGG.