Trending
CFPs: Alzheimer’s Research Grant Programme (UK) is trending now Drug-resistant gonorrhea on the rise in Europe, ECDC warns is trending now WHO Urges Africa To Break Barriers To Hepatitis Care is trending now Environmental changes help spread lassa fever in West Africa – Expert is trending now Carbon nanotube model reveals how smart sensors perform at aircraft-like extremes is trending now Molecules stop carbon nanotubes clumping, unlocking record heat-to-electricity performance is trending now New cell imaging method measures protein folding in living organelles is trending now Scientists discover mystery molecule on Pluto and Saturn's moon Titan: 'We cannot say wha… is trending now Chelsea step up interest in Palace's Lacroix is trending now A cavalcade of international stars headlined the World Cup’s first-ever halftime final sh… is trending now Spain’s World Cup Heroes Return Home Ahead Of Victory Parade is trending now Argentina FA president pays tribute to Lionel Messi: 'A story that will live forever' is trending now CFPs: Alzheimer’s Research Grant Programme (UK) is trending now Drug-resistant gonorrhea on the rise in Europe, ECDC warns is trending now WHO Urges Africa To Break Barriers To Hepatitis Care is trending now Environmental changes help spread lassa fever in West Africa – Expert is trending now Carbon nanotube model reveals how smart sensors perform at aircraft-like extremes is trending now Molecules stop carbon nanotubes clumping, unlocking record heat-to-electricity performance is trending now New cell imaging method measures protein folding in living organelles is trending now Scientists discover mystery molecule on Pluto and Saturn's moon Titan: 'We cannot say wha… is trending now Chelsea step up interest in Palace's Lacroix is trending now A cavalcade of international stars headlined the World Cup’s first-ever halftime final sh… is trending now Spain’s World Cup Heroes Return Home Ahead Of Victory Parade is trending now Argentina FA president pays tribute to Lionel Messi: 'A story that will live forever' is trending now
EDM

Opinion Letter Issued by the Department of Labor on Calculating Overtime

On September 30, 2025, the Department of Labor's (DOL) Wage and Hour Division issued a new opinion letter clarifying that "emergency pay" premiums provided to firefighters and other non-exempt employees during declared emergencies must be included in the regular rate of pay when calculating overtime premiums under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The DOL reviewed a request from a firefighter/paramedic in a Texas municipality, who inquired about the city's emergency pay policy. This policy provides a 50% premium (half the employee's base hourly rate) for every hour worked during declared emergency periods. The firefighter believed that this payment should be included in overtime calculations and sought confirmation from the DOL. The DOL concluded that the emergency pay does not qualify for any statutory exclusion from the regular rate under Section 7(e) of the FLSA. Specifically, the payment fails the three-prong test for discretionary bonuses because, (1) once the emergency work is performed, the employer has no discretion whether to pay, (2) the amount is predetermined (50% of base rate), not discretionary, and (3) the amount is determined before the work is performed, not "at or near the end of the period." The payment doesn't qualify as an exclusion from overtime under Sections 7(e) because the payment is not contingent on working beyond a specified number of hours (e.g., 8 hours/day or 40 hours/week), working on weekends, holidays, or special days, nor working outside regular hours or workdays. Rather, the emergency pay is a premium for hazardous or arduous work conditions, similar to night shift differential, which federal regulations specifically state must be included in the regular rate. The DOL provided this example for proper overtime calculation: An employee earning $20/hour works 50 hours in a week, with 20 of those hours during an emergency period: Straight-time earnings: (50 hours × $20) + (20 hours × $10 emergency premium) = $1,200 Regular rate: $1,200 ÷ 50 hours = $24/hour Overtime premium: $24 × 0.5 = $12/hour for 10 OT hours = $120 Total compensation: $1200 regular rate + $120 overtime premium = $1,320 Public sector employers with similar emergency pay policies should determine whether emergency, hazard, or other conditional premium pay is being properly included in regular rate calculations. Employers should also consider whether retroactive adjustments may be needed. The opinion applies specifically to the facts presented in the letter, but provides important guidance for employers providing premium pay for working during emergencies, hazardous conditions, or other special circumstances that don't fit within the narrow FLSA exclusions.

On September 30, 2025, the Department of Labor's (DOL) Wage and Hour Division issued a new opinion letter clarifying that "emergency pay" premiums provided to firefighters and other non-exempt employees during declared emergencies must be included in the regular rate of pay when calculating overtime premiums under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

The DOL reviewed a request from a firefighter/paramedic in a Texas municipality, who inquired about the city's emergency pay policy. This policy provides a 50% premium (half the employee's base hourly rate) for every hour worked during declared emergency periods. The firefighter believed that this payment should be included in overtime calculations and sought confirmation from the DOL.

The DOL concluded that the emergency pay does not qualify for any statutory exclusion from the regular rate under Section 7(e) of the FLSA. Specifically, the payment fails the three-prong test for discretionary bonuses because, (1) once the emergency work is performed, the employer has no discretion whether to pay, (2) the amount is predetermined (50% of base rate), not discretionary, and (3) the amount is determined before the work is performed, not "at or near the end of the period."

The payment doesn't qualify as an exclusion from overtime under Sections 7(e) because the payment is not contingent on working beyond a specified number of hours (e.g., 8 hours/day or 40 hours/week), working on weekends, holidays, or special days, nor working outside regular hours or workdays. Rather, the emergency pay is a premium for hazardous or arduous work conditions, similar to night shift differential, which federal regulations specifically state must be included in the regular rate.

The DOL provided this example for proper overtime calculation:

An employee earning $20/hour works 50 hours in a week, with 20 of those hours during an emergency period:

Straight-time earnings: (50 hours × $20) + (20 hours × $10 emergency premium) = $1,200

Regular rate: $1,200 ÷ 50 hours = $24/hour

Overtime premium: $24 × 0.5 = $12/hour for 10 OT hours = $120

Total compensation: $1200 regular rate + $120 overtime premium = $1,320

Public sector employers with similar emergency pay policies should determine whether emergency, hazard, or other conditional premium pay is being properly included in regular rate calculations. Employers should also consider whether retroactive adjustments may be needed.

The opinion applies specifically to the facts presented in the letter, but provides important guidance for employers providing premium pay for working during emergencies, hazardous conditions, or other special circumstances that don't fit within the narrow FLSA exclusions.

View original source →

Related